Reparations: A Very Basic Primer

Reparations: a process of repairing, healing and restoring a people injured because of their group identity and in violation of their fundamental human rights. In 2019, the House held a Hearing on H.R. 40, Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act.  There was no vote but the hearing itself was historic.  We take a look at what led up to this point.

A Timeline Leading Up to The “Revitalization” of Barry Farm

With the deconstruction and rebuilding of Barry Farm under way, it is important to understand some of the key factors of this process, what led up to it and how it has been affecting the existing community. Here is a somewhat concise timeline of events to provide context and stay updated on the fast-changing neighborhood.

Incompatible Allies: Black Lives Matter, March 4 Our Lives and the US Debate about Guns and Violence
   
After the mass shooting in Parkland, student activists did their level best to move the US to adopt gun reform. Grassroots DC's documentary Incompatible Allies asks if the gun reform that they call for is in line with the demands of Black Lives Matter, with whom they claim to have an affinity?

Initiative 77 & The Crisis of The Tipped Minimum Wage

The minimum wage for hourly workers in the District of Columbia is set to increase to $15.00. For Tipped workers, which can include servers, valets, and bartenders, receive $3.89 per hour, with an anticipated increase to $5.00 by 2020. If it seems unfair, that's because it is.

Community Tenant Meeting in Chinatown

Disparity in DC Public Schools

Several conclusions have been brought to the public view to why students specifically in DC public schools are dropping out. This problem has become an obvious and almost unavoidable factor mainly in the districts public highs schools. The issue is disturbing and draws the attention of almost everyone, some who wish the crisis would fade, but perhaps the approach is what needs to be changed. Many have chosen elementary tactics to “handle” the problem, playing the blame game, directing their attacks strictly to students and their guardians. While this may be true for some situations, not every case can be labeled as student or parent neglect. Many factors play a role in why students are being pushed away from educational institutions that have not yet been accounted for.

In order to correctly explain the problem the first thing that needs to be pointed out is that the statistics concerning dropout and suspension/expulsion rates, “disproportionately target students of color” (http://www.pbs.org). Based on studies from The Advancement Project, a human rights and civil rights organization, the ratio of black students’ likelihood of being suspended is 1:4 while the likelihood of their white counterparts being suspended is 1:20 (http://theadvancementproject.org). These rates create concerns surrounding what actually goes on in our school systems and what is causing mainly students of color to dropout. Some have credited this crisis to racial discrimination and there is evidence that supports that position. Standardized testing, suspensions for minor offenses and lack of interest on the schools behalf are some of the practices that reaffirm these claims. These practices cause a lack of community, creating an uncomfortable environment for students to engage in while weakening their chances of securing a safe and successful future for themselves.

A common term associated with discrimination within schools is the School to Prison Pipeline (STPP). The STPP is a system that pushes students away from school, into the many troubles of the world and eventually into jail. This has been an unsettled problem that has received little recognition therefore inadequate solutions for years. Our government puts a bigger investment in sending students to jail rather than sending them to school, spending almost four times as much money building new prisons to incarcerate our youth. The reason behind some of these suspensions, expulsions and arrests include playing music on phones, talking back to teachers, throwing temper tantrums and hugging friends (http://safequalityschools.org). Teachers and faculty are giving students of color student punishments that do not match the level of the offense. The repeat in suspensions and expulsions only take students out of the classroom leaving them further behind in their work. This creates a pattern. As teachers continue to suspend and expel students, they aren’t given the time to learn the material they missed in the classroom preventing them from being able to properly do their work. This also aggravates them, eventually pushing them out of school and into the streets.

DC action for children has provided their reasons for why some students are excelling while others fail within a singular and supposedly equal learning system. They have contributed these achievement differences to “socioeconomic differences” or the gap between high and low-income families. (http://dcactionforchildren.org). Specifically regarding education, these socioeconomic differences determine the quality of education based on location and who attends the school. This plays into how money is dispersed throughout the several wards in the district and the schools in these neighborhoods. Students in wards 2 and 3 have much higher test scores than students in in wards 7 and 8, a reflection of the educational differences in these areas. High poverty neighborhoods, such as wards 7 and 8, are more likely to have under resourced schools contributing to the performance of the students that attend these schools. The “lack” of resources in schools, ranging from empty libraries to limited textbooks, makes it hard and sometimes impossible for students to maintain their studies causing them to feel school is a waste of time.

In addition to under funding and unjust punishments, students of color are also being pushed out of schools to maintain the reputation of standardized test scores. This goes against the second, sixth, seventh and twenty-sixth human right laws that secure equality despite skin color, the right to be treated equally by the law and the right to go to school (http://state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2008/108544.htm). Over the years different publications such as the New York Post and Teacher Revised have done research regarding the SAT and other official exams and how they are being portrayed . . . → Read More: Disparity in DC Public Schools

One Student’s Take On What Really Matters In DC Public Schools

I asked DC Public School graduate Quintess Bond why she thought DCPS test scores were so low? She presents her thesis in the form of this documentary. In it, Quintess explores the theory that good schools need active parents, engaged students and a dedicated faculty and administrative staff. I think she puts a bit too much emphasis on the role of the parents but that can be forgiven. After suffering a stroke and losing her job, Quintess’ mother struggled mightily just to keep her daughter clothed, housed and fed. In addition, she insisted that Quintess stay on top of her school work. As a result, Quintess graduated salutatorian from School Without Walls in 2012. School Without Walls is one of the highest performing high schools in the DC public school system.

Not many parents have the strength and determination that Quintess’ mother Pearl has. If they did, we might not need to worry about the school system at all. Quintess’ documentary explores the theory that

Next week, Anaise Aritide will present her take on why there are such large disparities in DC public schools.

A Rundown of Everything You Need to Know About the DC Statehood Movement

What is the District of Columbia (DC) statehood movement?

The DC statehood movement is a grassroots, organizational and political campaign to change DC from a federal district with limited political power into a state with full voting, representation and local governance rights for its citizens.

Who supports DC statehood?

According to a 2005 poll conducted by KRC research, 78 percent of Americans wrongly believed that District residents already had full equal voting rights and representation enjoyed by their nearby state resident counterparts. When told that they were incorrect, 82 percent of those surveyed supported District residents gaining full equal voting rights and representation.

However, findings vary on how pollers ask the DC statehood question and context of the present. Right before the government shutdown, Rasmussen Reports published a poll of 1,000 voters that found only 25 percent of Americans wanted DC statehood. Critics and supporters of DC statehood felt this poll was misleading, and encouraged the myths and false facts surrounding the DC Statehood argument.

When the facts are set straight, support for DC voting rights and representation generally increases.

How will statehood impact the lives of District residents politically?

Right now, District residents can vote for President and elect a non-voting Delegate to Congress. Residents also vote for Mayor as well both the at-large members of the Council of the District of Columbia and their respective neighborhood Ward member of the Council.

However, it wasn’t until 1961 that the 23rd Constitutional Amendment was ratified, which granted District residents the right to vote in Presidential elections, and not until 1973 when Congress passed the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, which granted District residents limited power to govern their own city government with a Mayor and City Council.

If DC becomes a state, District constituents would be entitled to full voting rights and congressional representation, meaning they will be able to elect at least one representative to the House of Representatives and two senators to the Senate.

The House of Representatives initiates all legislative matters related to the country’s budget, funding and spending, while the Senate has the power to impact international diplomatic treaties between countries and confirm presidential appointments, such as Supreme Court nominations. Right now, DC citizens have no say on these matters because their non-voting delegate is not allowed to vote on any pieces of legislation.

What political power do local elected officials in DC have right now?

Home rule, which refers to the ability and opportunity for DC residents to have full say and control over their local affairs, is limited. Congress has the power to overturn any local District law and compared to the rest of the country, exercises an unprecedented right to oversee and control the District.

Even now, the Mayor’s Office and City Council can be dissolved at the leisure of Congress, and DC’s budget (mandated to always have to balance) is subject to Congressional approval.

Traditionally, and even today, the committees of Congress assigned to oversee the District are viewed as lacking both prestige and importance by Congressional members.

Currently the District is overseen by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform plus its Subcommittee on Health Care, District of Columbia, Census and National Archives. DC deserves to have elected officials with legislative authority who are fully invested in its residents, rather than out-of-touch members of Congress more concerned with the happiness of their own respective states and districts.

Isn’t it constitutionally illegal for DC to become a state?

No, actually it’s not. The only real limit set forward by the Constitution is that DC cannot exceed a 100 square miles area, but there’s no instructions regarding how small D.C. can be. The District could be theoretically downsized into a non-residential area that includes federal and military office buildings, with the rest of the residential parts of the District being incorporated into a state with full voting rights.

Wouldn’t the process to make DC a state be tedious and difficult?

States have actually been created 85 percent as many times as we have elected a president. Since the original 13 states joined the Union by their ratification of the Constitution in 1789, the U.S. has added approximately one new state every 6 years.

There isn’t enough people for the District to be a state.

The 2012 Census estimated that the District had 632,323 residents, placing it ahead of Vermont’s 626,011 and Wyoming’s 576,412. In addition, there are more district residents that are military personnel than in 31 of the other states . . . → Read More: A Rundown of Everything You Need to Know About the DC Statehood Movement

Is Museum Square’s Owner on a Mission to Displace All Affordable Housing Renters?

Residents at Museum Square‘s sister property, Mount Vernon Plaza, received letters mandating a $500+ a month rent increase.

Azieb Tesfamariam, a recent immigrant from Eritrea and single mother of three, was looking for housing early last year. She couldn’t afford her yearly rent increase of $50 a year so she went out searching for something more affordable. She found Mount Vernon Plaza. Even though she laments that many Americans cannot understand her Eritrean accent, she carefully explained to the leasing consultant in April 2013 that she needed a housing unit that had little to no annual rent increases a year. He assured her that Mount Vernon Plaza had an excellent affordable housing program that would not exceed her budget.

Mount Vernon Plaza–one of only two affordable apartment complexes remaining in DC’s Chinatown.

She moved into the unit on April 1, 2013, paying a little over $1000 a month for her two-bedroom apartment. On December 16, 2013, she received a letter from Mount Vernon Plaza’s Associates telling her that her rent will no longer be affordable. She will have to start paying $1624.50 a month starting March 31st 2014. Confused, she took her letter to all of the government-sponsored housing assistance agencies in the city. She asked them how is this possible. She’s a single mother who works at a nearby hotel cleaning rooms; paid work is never a certainty since she does not have seniority yet. “Why did the management ask me to move into this apartment, if they were going to end the program that year,” she questioned?

Over the Christmas holiday instead of worrying about what gifts to purchase for her children, she was desperately searching for affordable housing. By January 31st, the final date the management demanded a decision about whether she will leave or stay, she signed a new lease with the MVP. Dejected and financially broke, she currently spends all of her money on rent, occasionally asking family members to help when she can’t earn enough money from her part-time job.

Eventually, someone referred her to Organizing Neighborhood Equity, a long-time organizing group that organizes residents around their right to affordable housing and good living-wage jobs. ONE DC and Mount Vernon Plaza residents discovered they are not covered by project-based Section 8 protections, unlike MVP’s sister property, Museum Square. MVP residents are not guaranteed a voucher or even the right to purchase when the building goes on sale or when the project-based section 8 affordability ends. Residents under this program must either pay near or at market-rent or move out. This is the reason the Mount Vernon Plaza’s owner/lawyers gave when residents cried foul.

But MVP residents insisted something sinister and unethical is going on. Not only is the same owner moving to demolish its sister company, Museum Square, the owner refuses to be transparent with the MVP residents about their now-expired LIHTC program. When residents moved in, the management company gave no indication that the program would end in 2013 or that they would have to move or pay exorbitant rents after the program expired. “The management had to know that the program would be ending in 2013; why did they leave us in the dark for all this time?,” Trayawn Brown asked. “And they still haven’t told everyone in the program that the program is over. I think they are just trying to avoid mass vacancies.”

Instead, they were given a two-month notice and expected to pay for units that many residents argue are in various states of disrepair. In state of panic, residents have been moving out left and right; some are moving in with family members, becoming essentially homeless.

Through organizing, residents realized that there’s a bigger –citywide—problem. The city has almost universally relied on LIHTC to produce “affordable” housing in the city. Yet this type of affordable housing goes by income that’s based on the Area Median Income (DC’s AMI currently stands at $108,000 for a household of four). LIHTC is generally priced at 60% AMI or 80% AMI. As the general income of DC and the surrounding areas rises, so does the LIHTC rents—which now hover around over 1000 for a one bedroom, when priced at 60% AMI. Without a voucher and supplemental income, residents like MVP renters cannot find comparable housing in the quickly gentrifying areas of NW, where many of them have lived for close to two decades.

But more than that, LIHTC has no provision mandating affordability after the tax credits expire. In 1990, . . . → Read More: Is Museum Square’s Owner on a Mission to Displace All Affordable Housing Renters?