Reparations: A Very Basic Primer

Reparations: a process of repairing, healing and restoring a people injured because of their group identity and in violation of their fundamental human rights. In 2019, the House held a Hearing on H.R. 40, Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act.  There was no vote but the hearing itself was historic.  We take a look at what led up to this point.

A Timeline Leading Up to The “Revitalization” of Barry Farm

With the deconstruction and rebuilding of Barry Farm under way, it is important to understand some of the key factors of this process, what led up to it and how it has been affecting the existing community. Here is a somewhat concise timeline of events to provide context and stay updated on the fast-changing neighborhood.

Incompatible Allies: Black Lives Matter, March 4 Our Lives and the US Debate about Guns and Violence
   
After the mass shooting in Parkland, student activists did their level best to move the US to adopt gun reform. Grassroots DC's documentary Incompatible Allies asks if the gun reform that they call for is in line with the demands of Black Lives Matter, with whom they claim to have an affinity?

Initiative 77 & The Crisis of The Tipped Minimum Wage

The minimum wage for hourly workers in the District of Columbia is set to increase to $15.00. For Tipped workers, which can include servers, valets, and bartenders, receive $3.89 per hour, with an anticipated increase to $5.00 by 2020. If it seems unfair, that's because it is.

Panel Discussion on the Impact of the Prison Industrial Complex on DC Residents

In 2008, Washington, DC had the fourth highest incarceration rate in the United States. By 2010, DC had climbed number one. What’s going on?! For answers, join Family and Friends of Incarcerated People this Wednesday, May 29th at the K Street Busboys and Poets for the following panel discussion. The event starts at 6:00 PM.

For more on this subject read the Justice Policy Institute’s July 2010 report A Capitol Concern: The disproportionate impact of the justice system on low-income communities in D.C.

Major Campaign Donors Score Hefty City Subsidies

Cross-posted from WAMU by Julie Patel and Patrick Madden

Tax-related subsidies increased 24-fold. Data from D.C.’s Office of Revenue Analysis.

No. 1 in the series: Deals for Developers, Cash for Campaigns

CLICK HERE to Listen to the podcast.

A historic mansion in Georgetown, a downtown office building flipped for a record profit and luxury apartments with a car elevator, a block from the White House.

These are among the developments in D.C. receiving tax breaks and discounted public land.

A WAMU investigation found the city awarded $1.7 billion in subsidies to 133 groups in the past decade — and more than a third of the subsidies went to ten developers that donated the most campaign cash over that time. Meanwhile, a fraction of the subsidies went to the city’s poorest neighborhoods.

“By a lot of metrics the District is … the hottest real estate market” in the country, said Tommy Cafcas of Good Jobs First, an economic subsidies watchdog. “So why does the city need to be giving out all of these tax breaks to these major developers?”

On paper, the District has low campaign finance limits: From $500 for most council races to $2,000 for mayoral campaigns. In practice, developers can “bundle” donations through employees, family members and by writing multiple checks to a single candidate through limited liabilities and other affiliates.

Some of the developers said they donate to be civically engaged — not to win favors.

Likewise, city officials said they approve projects not to boost their campaign coffers but because developers pledge affordable housing, jobs and other benefits for taxpayers. But the promises often aren’t enforced, or the subsidies simply weren’t needed.

And what began as a targeted economic development tool, now looks to some like government handouts run amok.

WAMU’s investigation involved examining thousands of pages of city documents on 110 developments receiving city subsidies in the past decade, 133 groups benefiting from the subsidies and campaign contributions for council, mayoral and other local races over that time. It found:

* Groups receiving subsidies donated more than $2.5 million in campaign cash. * The ten developers that donated the most were on development teams that benefit from $641 million – or more than a third of all the subsidies examined. * Nearly half of the donors had multiple affiliates donating and 19 had at least 10. * Less than 5 percent of the subsidies were for projects in wards 7 and 8 — the city’s poorest areas with a fourth of the population. * A dozen developers spent the most campaign cash the year their subsidy was approved and there were 10 dates in which three or more companies developing a project together donated to a single candidate on the same day.

“This is, of course, pay to play politics in gory detail,” Bruce Cain, a political science professor at Stanford University, said after reviewing WAMU’s findings. “I doubt that anyone was so stupid as to be explicit about what was being traded…More likely [the trading] is done with quiet understanding about what is expected of people who want a subsidy.”

Cain added that most D.C. residents “lack both the means and the motive” to donate hefty sums of campaign cash: “This is about a system that forces elected officials to raise private money and the people with the most motivation to give are the people who get direct benefits from the system such as subsidies.”

CLICK HERE to read the rest of the article at WAMU.

Call to Action: Tell DC Council to Fund Subsidized Child Care

How much money were you making in 2004? Could you survive on that today? Maybe, maybe not. Might be a stretch but hey, times are tough. How about 27% of what you were making in 2004, could you survive on that? Unless 2004 was a real banner year and you made ten times what you’re making today, maintaining your lifestyle on that money would be impossible. If you were making less than the median income for Washington, DC in 2004, then 27% of that amount won’t even meet your basic needs.

Yet the DC Government refuses to pay child care providers who accept the city’s subsidized child care vouchers, more than 27% of the rate they should have been paid in 2004. Aaron Brooks, owner of Power To Become Child Care Center and Jeffrey Credit, owner of Community Child Development Center are more than a little peeved about the situation. They let the city council know during a day of lobbying at the Wilson Building headed by Empower DC child care organizer Sequnely Gray. The following video lays out their argument.

Despite a $417 million surplus in the city’s budget, Mayor Vincent Gray and the DC City Council are unlikely to increase funding for DC’s subsidized child care program unless someone like you accepts the challenge and makes them change their minds. Contact your city council members and tell them to fund subsidized child care. Here are their phone numbers and email addresses:

Councilmember Phil Mendelson (202) 724-8032 pmendelson@dccouncil.us

At-Large Councilmember Anita Bonds (202) 724-8064 abonds@dccouncil.us

At-Large Councilmember David Grosso (202) 724-8105 dgrosso@dccouncil.us

At-Large Councilmember David Catania (202) 724-7772 dcatania@dccouncil.us

At-Large Councilmember Vincent Orange (202) 724-8174 vorange@dccouncil.us

Ward 1 Councilmember Jim Graham (202) 724-8181 jgraham@dccouncil.us

Ward 2 Councilmember Jack Evans (202) 724-8058 jevans@dccouncil.us

Ward 3 Councilmember Mary Cheh (202) 724-8062 mcheh@dccouncil.us

Ward 4 Councilmember Muriel Bowser (202) 724-8052 mbowser@dccouncil.us

Ward 5 Councilmember Kenyan McDuffie (202) 724-8028 kmcduffie@dccouncil.us

Ward 6 Councilmember Tommy Wells (202) 724-8072 twells@dccouncil.us

Ward 7 Councilmember Yvette Alexander (202) 724-8068 yalexander@dccouncil.us

Ward 8 Councilmember Marion Barry (202) 724-8045 mbarry@dccouncil.us

Doing Right By the District’s Children

Child care in Washington DC is vital for a family to work, live, and participate in the community in a positive way. Without proper child care, parents- particularly single parents- may be forced to cut back their work hours, turn down promotions, or even quit their stable jobs. For the children, these early years provide the foundation for their future development; quality child care prepares children for success in school. Child care is increasingly expensive and many families cannot afford it on their own wages. In the District, the average yearly child care cost for an infant/toddler is $18,200. These are clear facts that have been widely documented.

So then why is funding for subsidies continually cut? Why are reimbursement rates for providers so low that they can’t afford to provide high quality care?

Child care advocates all over the District have been working for years to right the funding wrongs of the Office of State Superintendent of Education (OSSE). Funding for the child care subsidy program has been slashed dramatically while the need for these subsidies continues to grow at a steady pace. Last year, the council passed a budget that cut $5.7 million; in the last five years subsidies have been cut nearly $30 million. This is 1,600 families that were unable to participate in the subsidy program. This is 1,600 families who could not get child care.

This year, in the Mayor’s released budget, the child care subsidy/voucher program made it to #1 on his wish list. Child care should not be a “wish” because the money is there. The District has enough funds and new sources of revenue to restore the money that has been taken away from this program.

In fiscal year 2014, the childcare subsidy/voucher program will lose another 1.5 million dollars due to sequestration. This budget cut affects about 80 more families who need childcare subsidies to work, attend school and seek employment. However, the District of Columbia has the money to replace what is being cut. DC has generated over 400 million dollars of extra revenue for the city in the past year but they put all of it in the bank. Meanwhile, parents are still having challenges getting childcare vouchers and their children are missing out on an early start in education. The mayor and his team regularly say how much they care about families and, in particular, vulnerable children in this city. They sure have a funny way of showing it. Now it’s up to the Council to plug the leak in childcare subsidies. We need to restore the lost funding for childcare subsidies and give higher reimbursement rates for childcare providers. Because DC doesn’t work without childcare.

In D.C., parents miss work, lose jobs trying to get child-care subsidy

Cross-Posted from the Washington Post written by Brigid Schulte

At 6:30 a.m. on a Wednesday early this month, Andria Swanson, dressed in a bright-pink terry cloth jumpsuit, joined a line that was already snaking down South Capitol Street in Congress Heights.

She nervously counted the people ahead of her.

“I’m number 19,” she said. “That means I’ll get in today.” At number 20, she said, caseworkers close the doors and tell you to come back another day.

Ahead of her in line, Joelle Flythe had been waiting, for the third day in a row, since 5 a.m. The first person in line had arrived at 3:45 a.m.

This was Swanson’s second trip of the week to the Congress Heights Service Center, the only place run by the city where poor and working-poor parents can apply for a subsidy to help pay for child care.

It will not be her last.

Over the past two years, Swanson said, she has repeatedly waited in line at this office, once for more than nine hours as she missed work and college classes. She’s made multiple trips after caseworkers told her she needed more paperwork. At one point, she said, she missed so much work trying to get the child-care subsidy that she lost her job, landed in a shelter and went on welfare.

Last month, Swanson began a job for the grass-roots advocacy nonprofit group Empower DC, tasked with helping improve the very subsidy process she has found so frustrating. So on this particular morning, she asked another mother to hold her place in line while she interviewed people about their experiences and asked them to sign a petition to improve the system.

“This process is hell,” Swanson said. “H-E-L-L.”

It’s never been easy for low-income parents in the District to secure high-quality child care. But now the stakes are very high.

This fall, the District will begin limiting how long families can stay on welfare to five years. Liberals and conservatives agree that affordable child care is essential in moving people off welfare and into jobs and in helping them keep those jobs.

But that goal is greatly complicated by the realities of the city’s child-care subsidy program — with its counterproductive system for receiving and renewing benefits, its inadequate funding for the subsidies themselves and the lack of child-care centers willing to accept the vouchers.

City officials agree that the system is flawed. “The process needs a lot of fixing,” said David Berns, director of the Department of Human Services.

As many as 25,000 people apply for child-care subsidies every year, he said, but the city has only seven caseworkers to determine eligibility.

Berns said he has successfully lobbied for funding from the Division of Early Learning to increase staff at the Congress Heights Service Center by seven or eight. His department also hopes to begin streamlining the subsidy process next fall, he said. And in two years, he said, a new computer system should enable parents to apply for subsidies online.

“We have a real sense of urgency,” said Deborah Carroll, director of DHS’s Economic Security Administration. “You can’t get a job if you can’t put your kid in child care.

CLICK HERE to read the entire article at the WashingtonPost.com.

I’ve reposted the comments that followed the above Washington Post article because they represent the kind of mentality that helps keep DC Government from fully funding the subsidized child care program. I hope they are not representative of all Washington Post readers. They’re actually difficult to find (I had to click on the photo gallery to get to them) which may explain why only seven people commented. I’m just using the abbreviations for those posters who used their real names.

Baby Huey in the City wrote: STOP having babies, if you CAN’T take care of them! It’s that simple

ABS wrote: She just stuck her foot in her mouth… How can she receive Unemployment, is currently employed, has an employed fiance AND receive public assistance–AND STILL COMPLAINING? Hummm….

cr1957ny wrote: I still do not understand how someone who is 22 or 23 years old and doesn’t have a pot to go in has 2-3 kids already. It just seems really irresponsible, and why should others have to support that irresponsibility? If you don’t have a job that pays well enough to support a child, stop having them! Get married. I mean, really. I feel bad for the kids, but this constant subculture thing about popping babies out with . . . → Read More: In D.C., parents miss work, lose jobs trying to get child-care subsidy