By Liane Scott, on September 24th, 2010
Empower DC set up the PEOPLE’S SOAPBOX for the first time at last weekend’s Black LUV festival. In our first edition, Brian Anders has some ideas about how to deal with homelessness and DC’s affordable housing crisis. Do you agree with him or not?
Expect more from the PEOPLE’S SOAPBOX soon.
By Liane Scott, on September 9th, 2010
On May 15, 2010, over 125 local organizers and activists representing a diverse range of issues came together to discuss the state of the local progressive movement and provide a vision for the future. Participants of the Greater DC People’s Assembly began to create a People’s Agenda, which they brought to the US Social Forum in Detroit for endorsement and action.
Hazal Yolga, an intern with the Washington Peace Center, put together the above video promoting the People’s Assembly. Hazal took advantage of the free training in video editing (specifically Final Cut Pro) offered by the Grassroots Media Project to any Empower DC member interested in producing media that improves and promotes the self-advocacy of low- and moderate-income DC residents. Besides being posted here, the video is being sent out over the People’s Assembly listserves and to their Facebook invite groups.
On August 7, the DC People’s Assembly met again to report back on the US Social Forum and to plan their next steps. In keeping with the goal of bringing together progressive activists to share expertise and work together on overlapping issues, three working groups were formed.
The Days of Action planning group is putting together events related to the October 2nd One Nation March. Contact Ben from Empower DC ben@empowerdc.org for more information. The People’s Agenda working group is finalizing the list of priorities and collective demands of the DC Metro Social Forum. To contribute to that discussion contact Anna Duncan of the Latino Economic Development Corporation aduncan@ledcmetro.org. The Community Media working group plans to establish an independent media forum dedicated to the pursuit of social justice. Greg Bloom from Bread for the City is heading that up and can be reached at greg.bloom@gmail.com.
As the producer of this blog, which I’d like to think is itself a media forum dedicated to the pursuit of social justice, I have joined the community media working group on behalf of the Grassroots Media Project. In fact there are a number of local media forums dedicated to the pursuit of social justice. DC’s Independent Media Center and the Washington Peace Center site both have been supporting and reporting activism for well over a decade. DC Watch is an on-line magazine about politics and public affairs in the District of Columbia. There are also several smaller sites whose content is dedicated to specific topics. DC Food for All and Beyond Bread cover issues relating to hunger and poverty in the nation’s capital, Save Our Safety Net covers issues pertaining to social services. Etc.
The problem is that for most of these blogs, this one included, the content is too specific and the audience too limited to make a substantial impact. Commercial blogs like DCist and the City Paper have a wide audience but they have no dedication to social justice. Like the more traditional news sources, commercial blogs and even many of the neighborhood blogs rarely look to DC’s low- and moderate-income residents as experts on the effect that legislation and public policy has on their lives.
Because the Internet has become a powerful way to influence our elected officials, social change activists need to use it. Although blogs and Youtube videos don’t always reach the low and moderate-income constituents that we social justice advocates work with, they do reach the middle- and high-income residents who hold sway over the city’s political leadership. Wouldn’t it be sweet if we had a forum with an audience as large as DCist, posting stories that educate DCs progressives about where our issues intersect and empowering our constituents to better advocate for themselves.
To that end the Grassroots DC will provide training in radio and video production to help participants build content for the site that the community media working group is currently calling DC Commons. The Washington Peace Center has agreed to connect their extensive social justice calendar to the site. But as of now, there are only a few organizations dedicated to providing content. We hope to change that at our first meeting, which is scheduled for Tuesday September 21, at the Empower DC office, 1419 V Street NW. For more information contact the Grassroots DC coordinator, liane@GrassrootsDC.org.
By Liane Scott, on August 31st, 2010
Having had parents who put a premium on education and having a daughter myself who is in DCPS, I try to follow what’s going on with the public schools. I have to admit being greatly disappointed every time Michelle Rhee makes an appearance on WAMU’s Kojo Nnamdi show. She was on again this last Friday August 28, 2010. You can find a copy of the transcript at the following link – http://thekojonnamdishow.org/shows/2010-08-27/politics-hour. A lot of what she says sounds great, but if you’re looking for specifics, you have to wait for a knowledgeable listener to make it on the air with a question.
Michelle Rhee’s Great Disapearing Act
For example, when Rhee was asked what she would do to improve special education in DCPS she gave a two paragraph answer, but the only specifics she gave came in these two sentences: “We spend upwards of $90 million a year transporting our students to a lot of private schools throughout the region. And we really need to look at what we’re doing to build the capacity within DCPS to serve a lot of those students better, so that they can attend their neighborhood schools.” So hopefully, Rhee is gonna ask her people to “look at what they’re doing,” with regard to special education. That’s reassuring, I guess.
Another caller asked about the drop in AYP test scores, which much of her reform was designed to improve. Rhee said that despite the fact that test scores have dropped, the huge gap between black and white student achievement has narrowed, has in fact narrowed significantly at the secondary level. But after looking at the statistics provided by Epsilon, the caller who posed the test score question, I’m wondering how she defines significant. According to Epsilon, “the most recent scores that came out for AYP shows that 88 percent of the schools in Ward 3 made AYP while 86 percent of the schools in Ward 8 failed. The achievements gap between blacks and whites is even more telling. The lowest achievement level for whites is at Watkins on Capitol Hill, which was 83.78 percent and then it goes up to 95.69 percent at Murch. While in Ward 8, we have Stanton School with the achievement of black — I mean, the achievement level for blacks is 12.72 percent. At Terrell, it’s 28.23 percent. At Savoy, a brand-new school, is 21.62 percent.”
I’m wondering how bad the gap was before the “significant” improvement. I also wonder if the gap wouldn’t have narrowed further and perhaps without the pain of school closings and teacher firings if Michelle Rhee and the Fenty Administration had taken a look at the funding gap between low-income schools and wealthier schools. I know that schools in DC are funded on a per pupil basis, but some pupils cost more to educate than others. No doubt, a look at the individual school budgets will verify this. Special education and special needs students, as Rhee herself seems to be aware, cost the city a significant amount of money in transportation alone. So what does it mean when these students attend low-income schools at a higher rate than wealthier schools? As far as I know, DC public schools don’t get more money for students that require specialized instruction.
How the city deals with special education students isn’t the only thing that contributes to the achievement gap between black and white students, but it is one thing that Rhee doesn’t seem to know a whole lot about. What else is she missing? Kojo Nnamdi and his guest analyst Tom Sherwood seemed more concerned about whether or not Rhee would stay on the job if Mayor Fenty loses his re-election bid. (Sounds like the answer is no by the way.) Neither of them questioned her about the controversies at Bruce Monroe or Hardy Elementary Schools. They praised the physical renovations taking place in schools on Capital Hill, but no mention was made of other schools, like Parkview Elementary (which currently houses students from the recently demolished Bruce Monroe) continue to deal with rodent infestations in the food supply. Rhee’s answers sounded like those of a politician, rather than an educational professional with an intricate understanding of the system she hopes to reform.
On the other hand, if you do in fact want to hear an educational professional willing to give detailed analysis and an honest assessment of the DC public school system, the place to turn would have to be WPFW. Reporter Pete Tucker . . . → Read More: Covering Education: Tucker vs Nnamdi
By Liane Scott, on August 20th, 2010
Tent City Protest at 7th & R Streets NW
On July 10, 2010 ONE DC and Take Back The Land set up a tent city at 7th and R Streets NW to protest the unfulfilled promises made by Mayor Fenty regarding the public property there, otherwise known as Parcel 42. The tent city got a fair amount of media attention at the start, but interest waned as the protest failed to move the Fenty Administration to action, beyond posting the sign in the picture of course. The sign, which reads, “Another Project from the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development,” sounds like Mayor Fenty is taking credit for the tent city. In a way, that’s accurate. If Fenty had followed through on the Memorandum of Understanding that he signed in 2007, then a tent city on that lot wouldn’t have been necessary.
The Grassroots Media Project’s radio production class gathered audio at tent city near the end of July. Interviews were conducted by Candace Wolfe, Navid Nasr, Crystal Elekwachi and Riley Abbott. The final piece was edited together by Riley Abbot.
A Brief Audio Archive of the Tent City Protest Tent City Protest at 7th & R Streets NW
Additionally, Eric Sheptock’s blog posts on the subject give you the perspective of a tent city resident. It’s also interesting to compare coverage by the City Paper, which focuses on whether or not the activists would achieve their goals, with coverage in the Afro American, which is more concerned with how affordable housing is defined by the city and why their definition is problematic.
By Liane Scott, on August 5th, 2010
Tenants Protest Outside of NLHA Headquarters
We all know that the supply of quality affordable housing in the District of Columbia is dwindling and has been for decades. This is not a problem unique to the District of Columbia, nor is it only a problem during bad economic times. Finding affordable housing during the relatively lucrative 90s, for instance, was not much easier than it is now.
Fortunately, there are federal programs that subsidize the cost of housing that local governments can use to help low- and moderate-income residents. The amount of affordable housing available dependents in part on regulations that determine things like how many units of an apartment building must be designated affordable and how low the rent must be before it fits into that category.
Landlords are often able to purchase buildings for relatively little money if they make a contract with a city or other jurisdiction to provide affordable housing. These property owners are aware of the regulations they must follow to remain in compliance with the subsidy program, but the tenants who make their homes in their buildings are often left in the dark.
The National Alliance of Hud Tenants is working to change that fact. Empower DC intern Chantal Taylor caught them in action as they took their case to the National Leased Housing Association on K Street.
|
Subscribe to Blog via Email
|